| FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Paul Steidler
917-612-3594 or 212-683-1203
steidler@area-alliance.org
Blackout Prevention
Experts:
New York Business, Labor, and Energy
Leaders Discuss Likelihood of a Major New Outage, Prevention
and Supply Issues
Two years after historic outage, tight supply gap and state inaction on power plant siting are major concerns; good news: federal reliability standards passed
New York, NY/August 9, 2005 – Two years
after a historic blackout that cost the New York metropolitan
area over $1 billion in lost inventories and economic activity,
New York has taken two steps back, and one step forward when
it comes to addressing its electricity supply and reliability
challenges.
That’s the bottom line conclusion of the New York Affordable
Reliable Electricity Alliance, a.k.a. New York AREA, a group
formed in late 2003 to make sure the lights not only stay
on, but that the metropolitan New York area has the energy
it needs to be a dynamic place to live and do business. It
was one year ago, shortly after its formation, that New York
AREA called on federal and state officials to take decisive
action to stave off future blackouts and better enable continued
growth in the region.
The good news is that newly enacted federal electric reliability
standards decrease the chance of out-of-state events causing
a major blackout like that which occurred in 2003. Of concern,
however, is that electricity demand is rising sharply, especially
in New York City and Long Island. Even more disconcerting
is that no new major power plants can be proposed in the state
because the Article X power plant siting statute has now been
expired since December 31, 2002.
New York AREA members, who include business and labor leaders
as well as independent energy experts, are available to discuss
these matters, particularly on the blackout anniversary and
in these record heat days of August.
Blackout Risk Remains Unacceptable
“New York continues to face a heightened risk of a major
blackout because for more than 950 days the state legislature
has failed to renew Article X of the Public Service Act, which
governs how new power plants can be built,” said Arthur
“Jerry” Kremer, Chairman of the Advisory Board
of New York AREA. Mr. Kremer is a former Chairman of the Assembly
Ways & Means Committee and played a central role in authoring
prior versions of Article X.
Article X provides a centralized, expedited review process
of new power plant proposals. It has long been the only practical
way for major new facilities to achieve streamlined review
and approval in New York State.
“For all intents and purposes, it takes five years from
the time that a business comes up with a proposal to have
it approved, constructed, and then operational. The gap that
we have created in New York’s power pipeline because
of more than 900 days of inaction is disturbing. Even if Article
X were renewed tomorrow, we would not have new sources of
energy online as a result of this action until 2010,”
said Mr. Kremer.
“With energy demand rising, particularly in New York
City and Long Island, Article X is needed now. Without it,
companies will not make proposals for new plants, workers
will not have highly skilled and well-paying jobs in building
and operating these facilities, and investors will not commit
any resources to strengthening New York’s infrastructure.
Right now, New York’s energy supply policy is inadequate
and does not meet a world-class standard, which is what consumers,
employers, and employees have come to expect of the greatest
state in America,” said Mr. Kremer.
Blackouts Have Major Immediate and
Longer-Term Costs
According to the New York City Comptroller, the cost of the
2003 blackout, in lost economic activity and perishable goods
to New York City alone, was $1 billion. As was the case in
California in 2001 blackouts can have a chilling effect on
a state’s economy because of the actual disruption and
uncertainty that they create, especially for commerce and
capital investments in the technology age.
“Companies considering expanding or re-locating in New
York want to make sure that the region has the energy it needs
to meet demand today, and that we have established the critical
path to ensuring a robust supply in the future,” said
Kathryn S. Wylde, President of the Partnership for New York
City, a New York AREA member.
“The current uncertainty, particularly given that the
Mayor’s Task Force on Energy last year projected that
the City will need 2,600 additional megawatts of new electricity
by 2008, makes it imperative that Article X be renewed –
and soon,” said Ms. Wylde.
New York Congressional Delegation
Must Scrutinize Federal Electric Reliability Standards
Congress recently passed a federal energy bill, signed into
law on August 8, 2005, which contains important provisions
to establish and enforce federal electric reliability standards
that will prevent “cascading” blackouts such as
that which occurred in 2003.
The legislation creates the Electric Reliability Organization
(ERO). ERO will be able to enforce previously voluntary electric
reliability standards, promulgated by the North American Electric
Reliability Council, that were strongly endorsed in April
2004 by the U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force. The
ERO should be able to enforce standards so that blackouts
are less likely to occur because of such factors as unrestrained
tree growth over power lines, poor operator training, and
failure to notify other states and utilities immediately of
power problems that occur.
As with any new bureaucracy, execution is imperative if its
mission is to be successful. New York AREA calls on the New
York Congressional delegation to carefully oversee and monitor
the ERO’s operations to ensure that states that have
traditionally had lower reliability standards than New York
do not cause another major power outage in the Empire State.
“This is a perfect example where an ounce of prevention
is worth a pound of cure,” said David Rosensweig, President
of the Fire Alarm Dispatchers Benevolent Association, a New
York AREA member. “Our members valiantly worked with
New Yorkers on August 14, 2003 to prevent major problems.
But it is not something we want or should have to go through
again,” said Rosensweig.
Fact Sheets and Additional Information
The following fact sheets from New York AREA provide additional
information about the downstate energy situation:
- The Growing Demand for
Electricity in New York
- Article X: A Primer
on the Expired Power Plant Siting Law
- Federal Electric Reliability
Standards: A Positive Development for New York
- Blackouts: The Economic Costs and Ramifications
Founded in November 2003, the New York Affordable Reliable
Electricity Alliance (New York AREA) is a diverse group of
more than 60 business, labor, and community groups whose mission
and purpose is to ensure that New York State and the New York
metropolitan area has an ample and reliable electricity supply,
and economic prosperity for years to come. New York AREA helps
to educate policy makers, businesses, and the general public
regarding the necessity for safe, reliable energy and the
importance of low-cost, reliable, clean electricity. For additional
information visit: www.area-alliance.org.
Watt a Tight Supply:
The Growing Demand for Electricity in New York
- “As the high temperatures continued into July (2005),
power use soared, with an all-time peak-demand record of
12,551 megawatts set on July 26. In addition, four of the
top 10 electric peak loads of all time have been reached
so far this summer, including a new record for the greatest
electricity demand ever on a June day.” Con Edison
website, Public Issues section.
- “The City has adequate energy resources for its
electricity needs today, but the margins necessary for reliability
are extremely thin ... To ensure reliability, to promote
economic growth, and to address environmental issues, the
Task Force concludes that the City needs 2,600 megawatts
of new electricity by 2008.” New York City Energy
Policy: An Electricity Resource Roadmap, report prepared
by the New York City Energy Policy Task Force, January 2004.
Note: 2,600 megawatts is approximately 30 percent more power
than is generated by the Hoover Dam.
- “…New York could be facing a supply deficiency
between 2008 and 2011. In New York City and Long Island,
there may well be needs prior to that time period.”
Power Trends 2005, report of the New York Independent System
Operator (NYISO), p. 5.
- “Peak demand for the summer of 2005 is expected
to be approximately 31,960 MW.” Power Trends 2005
report, p. 14.
- “Between 4 and 5 p.m. today, the NYISO recorded
an hourly average peak load of 32,075 megawatts (MW), which
broke last week’s record of 31,741 MW…”
NYISO, July 26, 2005 news release.
- “The developer of a proposed [1,000 megawatt] power-transmission
line for New York City has terminated the project, a setback
that casts doubt on whether independent electric-transmission
companies can make a go of it and build new lines needed
to bring the cheapest power to the places that need it most.”
“New York Power Project is Scrapped,” The Wall
Street Journal, November 22, 2004, p. B-2.
Article X: A Primer
on the Expired Power Plant Siting Law
Key Provisions (statute that expired December 31, 2002):
- Applications are decided upon by the seven member New
York State Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment
(Siting Board)
- Process guarantees opportunities
for public involvement. Under Article X, an applicant must
communicate with the public early in the pre-application
process through the use of various means such as media coverage,
direct mailings, fliers, or newsletters.
- Applicant must submit a fee of $1,000
per megawatt of capacity, up to $300,000, for an intervenor
fund.
- Expedited process sets the goal
of decisions on new power plant proposals within 14 months
of when an application is filed.
- Pertains to 80 megawatt and larger
projects.
- Determines whether the construction
and operation of the facility is in the public interest,
without giving control of this decision to NIMBY activists.
What Energy Experts and Leaders are Saying:
“We encourage the Legislature to act promptly on this
important legislation. Failure to do so will result in emptying
the pipeline of new generating projects that will be needed
in the near future, increasing a potential generation shortage.”
Power Trends 2005, New York Independent System Operator, p.
6
“With the fierce competition for investment dollars
in deregulated energy markets, it is important to send a strong
message to the financial world that New York is committed
to developing new, efficient sources of electric generation.
New York State needs to re-authorize Article X now.”
Gavin Donohue, President & CEO of the Independent Power
Producers of New York (IPPNY) in a June 7, 2005, IPPNY news
release.
“Suppose you went to the village hall to apply for a
permit to build a new house and were told to come back in
three years because no permits are being issued? This simple
example sums up the frustration of power plant builders who
have been waiting since December 2002 for the New York State
legislature to pass an extension of Article X of the Public
Service Law.” Arthur “Jerry” Kremer, Chairman
to the Advisory Board of New York AREA and an author of a
prior Article X statute.
Federal Electric
Reliability Standards:
A Positive Development for New York
- New York’s electric reliability standards have
exceeded those of most other states. Yet, problems in Ohio
in 2003 led to a cascading blackout effect which dramatically
impacted New York.
- Federal electric reliability standards are included in
the energy bill passed by both Houses of Congress in July
2005, and signed by President Bush.
- Standards, promulgated by the North American Electric
Reliability Council had widespread support from policy makers
and energy experts as early as April 2004, when the U.S.-Canada
Power System Outage Task Force issued its final report on
the 2003 blackout.
- Energy bill legislation creates an independent, industry-based
Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) that will be able
to enforce standards on such matters as tree growth by power
lines, operator training, prompt notification of other states
about power outages, and voltage control practices.
- It is imperative that New York’s Congressional
Delegation monitor the ERO and the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which has jurisdiction over the ERO, so there
is effective execution of the strategic promises of the
energy bill to increase electric reliability.
Blackouts: The Economic Costs and
Ramifications
- Companies regularly evaluate electricity costs and the
reliability of future supply when considering whether to
re-locate or expand in an area.
- Continued blackouts in New York will harm the state’s
business reputation, and put it in the same position as
California was in 2001 when it experienced period blackouts.
- As CNET.com reported in 2001, “The state’s
well publicized energy crisis, marked by rolling blackouts
during peak demand periods throughout the past year, has
been blood in the water for states and counties angling
to snatch California’ tech companies. From Minnesota
to Tennessee, eager politicians and leaders of chambers
of commerce are circling Silicon Valley executives, enticing
them with offers of cheap electricity … if they ditch
the Golden State.”
- According to the New York City Comptroller’s Office,
the historic August 14, 2003 blackout was a $1 billion hit
to the New York City economy. Losses were incurred from
spoiled food, lost retail and tourism income, lost wages,
and in many other areas.
- What could New Yorkers have done with $1 billion?
- Every man, woman, and child who lives in the City could
have gotten a check for approximately $124.87.
- Four million New York City commuters could ride the
subway free of charge, to and from work, from today to
end of November.
- More than 7,000 students could have four years of tuition
paid for at New York University.
- 78 water quality improvement projects could be funded
and administered in New York City.
- Ten million people could get orchestra seats to see
a prominent Broadway show of their choosing.
|
|